al2955: (Default)
AL-2955 ([personal profile] al2955) wrote in [community profile] cradleproject2016-07-04 01:53 pm

WEEK FIVE

the pygmalion. . .

ONLINE




CAPTAIN'S LOG:
WEEK (5)

monday - thursday

(33) survivors


It had been merely a week since the last trial, but you find yourself faced with a new week on The Pygmalion. When you awaken, you will find the handcuff around your wrist gone. The robot in the cafeteria has prepared another breakfast of various foods.

(OOC: Please submit your murder proposals by 9 PM EST Tuesday.)
taken list
profiles
private conversations
setting
rulebook
murder proposals



ENTER COMMAND_
breakshot: (pic#10407394)

[personal profile] breakshot 2016-07-07 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
←More like can we not? Period. Otherwise agreed.

[ That's in response to #dickgate the second reckoning. The dicks that he's now erased; rest easy for it is Pure once more. For now. ]

It's a better plan than none, so I don't think it should be entirely discounted. Just saying it's not entirely foolproof either. While it may not prevent murder plots entirely, we should have a better chance of ruling out suspects.
chiseler: (I am sick of listening)

[personal profile] chiseler 2016-07-07 07:22 pm (UTC)(link)
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Most of our plans won't be foolproof considiring we still don't know whose behind all this. If we can keep inching ahead that might help out? Liek taking it in stages. We do this one week, we do something else next week. Thoughts?


[Look at that, Machias, he actually cares about your opinion currently.]
breakshot: (pic#10407392)

[personal profile] breakshot 2016-07-07 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
[ but why can't you spell. why luke. ]

That's a start. I agree we shouldn't let anything stay routine for long. We don't want anyone planning around that. For now, let's take it in steps. We'll find out what works and what doesn't and work around any problems that crop up.

Another thing: partnering up sounds like a good plan, but what if the other person was to step out? There is a rule about participants not being allowed to sleep in another's room while the other isn't there, but does that rule still apply if one happens to leave as soon as the other is asleep?

It likely wouldn't be an issue if a hypothetical suspect stayed in a room that wasn't their own. I'm just curious about the other possible scenario - if there's a loophole.


[ goddess knows they're already found a couple of those. ]
chiseler: (with a signal that's out of range)

[personal profile] chiseler 2016-07-07 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
[#demigod. THE REAL REASON HE WANTED ADRIEN TO WRITE ALL OF THIS DOWN INSTEAD…]

At least somebody else is thinking about loopholes here. [Even if Luke's looking for them to use himself.] Those are also good points but unless we start installing tracking divices on everybody that makes it harder. We could always station somebody down at the end of the hall since everybody has to go the same way to get to other parts of the ship. If, in theory, everyone stays with at least one person in a room, they can't enter someone else's room without a third party being there.

…which opens up for people ganging up and murdering somebody else in a room and okay, I get it, that's a bad plan. What's next? Giant group sleepovers? How many people are alowed in a room at a time again?